ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
The Impact of Bilingual vs English-Only Instruction on the Performance of Undergraduate Saudi Medical Science Students.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of choice of instruction language on anatomy learning outcomes.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
- Coping strategies for learning medicine through English Medium Instruction: A mixed‑methods study of Saudi medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Embracing bilingualism in healthcare education: key stakeholders' voices.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Using English as the medium of instruction in science courses may hinder comprehension for students who lack sufficient English language proficiency. This challenge is particularly relevant in non-English speaking countries, where students may struggle to follow complex scientific content delivered exclusively in English. Methods: This study was conducted at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, where the majority of students are native Arabic speakers. To assess the impact of language on knowledge acquisition, two groups of first-year students enrolled in various health and medical science majors were compared. The test group attended a biology lecture delivered bilingually (Arabic and English), while the control group received the same lecture in English only. A pre- and post-test design was used to evaluate knowledge acquisition during the lecture session. Results: Both groups showed improvement in post-test scores; however, the test group demonstrated a statistically significant higher gain compared to the control group. Furthermore, 86% of students in the test group reported that the bilingual approach reduced distractions, and 98% reported improved understanding. In contrast, only 32% of the English-only group reported reduced distractions, and 56% felt it improved their understanding. Discussion: The findings suggest that bilingual instruction enhances comprehension and reduces cognitive load for students with limited English proficiency. This highlights the importance of adapting the medium of instruction to student language competencies in science education, especially for non-native English speakers, who lack sufficient English language skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.