ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2025
Correlation study of CAR, PLR, NLR with the prognosis of cardiogenic cerebral embolism patients.
Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio with conventional biomarkers for predicting septic shock in pediatric sepsis.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Correlations between inflammatory biomarkers in peripheral blood and branch retinal vein occlusion.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explored the association between inflammatory biomarkers-C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)-and the prognosis of patients with cardiogenic cerebral embolism (CCE). We retrospectively analyzed data from 80 CCE patients diagnosed between June 2020 and June 2024, categorizing them into favorable and unfavorable prognosis groups based on outcomes such as death, recurrence, and disability. The CAR, PLR, and NLR values were calculated from routine blood tests, and statistical analyses, including Spearman correlation, multivariate logistic regression, and ROC curve analysis, were performed to examine their prognostic significance. Results showed that the unfavorable prognosis group had significantly higher CAR, PLR, and NLR values compared to the favorable group (P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis revealed positive associations between these biomarkers and prognosis (r = 0.319 for CAR, 0.238 for PLR, 0.251 for NLR, all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified CAR and NLR as independent risk factors for unfavorable prognosis (OR = 1.034 for CAR, OR = 3.887 for NLR). ROC analysis determined optimal cutoff values for CAR (>0.74), PLR (>160.00), and NLR (>3.53) to predict unfavorable prognosis with AUCs of 0.796, 0.694, and 0.705, respectively. The combined biomarker test yielded an AUC of 0.899. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated significantly lower survival rates for patients with higher levels of CAR, PLR, and NLR (P < 0.05). In conclusion, elevated CAR, PLR, and NLR are reliable indicators of a poor prognosis in CCE patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.