Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599810›Full record

ArticleClimatic change2025

The social sciences in climate assessments in the United States.

Keely B Maxwell, Maureen Shacklette, Emily Eisenhauer, Austin A Scheetz, Elizabeth Marino, Ariela Zycherman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Climatic change, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Keely B MaxwellU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0802-4723
Maureen ShackletteOak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2422-4186
Emily EisenhauerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1754-4149
Austin A ScheetzNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5887-4606
Elizabeth MarinoOregon State University- Cascades, Bend, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3179-3587
Ariela ZychermanNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5001-9904

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article looks at the inclusion of the social sciences in recent climate assessment reports from national and sub-national jurisdictions (state, territory, district) of the United States. It compares and contrasts interdisciplinary integration based on three criteria: inclusion of societal topics; the use of social science frameworks, theory, and literature to interpret findings; and processes of knowledge production. National and sub-national climate assessments serve different societal purposes and decision-making goals, and are produced in distinct knowledge governance contexts. While climate focused social sciences are increasingly incorporated into assessments, the nature of this incorporation varies across assessment types. The greatest advancements for interdisciplinary integration in the Fifth National Climate Assessment are in the robust treatment of economics, equity and environmental justice, and social systems and the addition of core concepts to the climate lexicon. In sub-national assessments, alternative organizational formats open up space to examine climate-society interactions for sectoral or geographic topics of interest. However, their analysis often is limited to vulnerability mapping and dollar values instead of the broader social and economic systems that shape climate drivers, hazards, impacts, and responses. Most social sciences are present in climate impacts chapters. There is opportunity to engage additional social science in analysis of climate hazards, drivers of climate change, mitigation and adaptation efforts, and the underlying social causes of vulnerability. Better integration of the social and biogeophysical sciences can help assessments expand the language of climate response and universe of potential interventions, enabling them to inform decision-making at national to local scales.

Indexed as

Climate assessmentClimate changeInterdisciplinary integrationSocial sciencesSocial systems

Identifiers

PMID40599810
PMCPMC12207393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.