ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Navigating disruption in the PID landscape: embracing opportunities and anticipating threats in the next ten years.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing calculated globulin screening for immunodeficiencies: The benefits and challenges.Journal of human immunity · 2026Review
- ABO: A 3D stroma-supported culture platform enabling full human B-lymphopoiesis for disease modeling and gene therapy development.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI) held its third edition of the Global Multi-Stakeholders' Summit, gathering key primary immunodeficiencies (PID) stakeholders and experts to discuss and foment global collaboration. Methods: This edition focused on the impact of genomic medicine in PID treatment, the role of digital health, including artificial intelligence, in PID care, and how to anticipate and minimise risks to ensure optimal patient access to care. Results: These discussions aimed to examine current hurdles and brainstorm feasible solutions and priorities for the PID community in these areas in the next ten years. Discussion: These discussions led to recommendations for comprehensive approaches to care and access to treatment for PID patients, suggesting actions that will bring the community closer to treatments based on real-world evidence and adjusted to patient's needs. To accomplish this, collaboration between academia, industry, regulatory authorities, and patients is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.