Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599750›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Comparison of phenotypic selection of inbred lines, genomic selection of inbred lines, and evolutionary populations for field pea breeding in three Mediterranean regions.

Paolo Annicchiarico, Meriem Laouar, Imane Thami-Alami, Margherita Crosta, Nelson Nazzicari, Luciano Pecetti, Luigi Russi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paolo AnnicchiaricoResearch Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Lodi, Italy.
Meriem LaouarLaboratory of Integrative Improvement of Plant Production, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique (ENSA), Algiers, Algeria.
Imane Thami-AlamiCentre Régional de Rabat, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Rabat, Morocco.
Margherita CrostaResearch Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Lodi, Italy.
Nelson NazzicariResearch Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Lodi, Italy.
Luciano PecettiResearch Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Lodi, Italy.
Luigi RussiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pea breeding may rely on phenotypic selection (PS) of single-seed descent (SSD) or bulk-derived lines, line genomic selection (GS), and selection of evolutionary populations (EPs). This study aimed to compare all these approaches in region-specific grain yield selection for Central Italy, coastal Algeria, and inland Morocco, using material from three connected crosses of elite, geographically diverse parent cultivars. Bulk breeding and initial EP development were based on three-year mass selection for plant yield under managed severe drought for Algeria and Morocco, and four-year field-based natural and mass selection under autumn sowing in Northern Italy for Central Italy. One EP per region was eventually developed by additional region-specific three-year field-based natural selection on pooled three-cross material. Region-specific line selections were performed on each cross using three experiments per region for PS, and GS models developed in previous studies. An additional GS was performed for a putative Stressful Italy region by combining predictions for Italy and Morocco. In a comparison of top-performing bulk-derived lines vs. SSD-derived lines, the former out-yielded the latter by at least 10% in four environments featuring the same predominant stress (drought or low winter temperatures) that had acted on bulked progenies. All selections were evaluated in one location per target region for two cropping years, in a managed drought environment, and in intercropping with barley in Algeria and Morocco. Results indicated that: (a) EPs did not differ from GS- or PS-derived lines for mean yield in their target regions while showing greater yield stability, better response to a climatically unfavorable year, and broader adaptability to intercropping or other non-target environments; (b) EPs were out-yielded by the top-yielding line in each target region; (c) GS- and PS-derived lines did not differ in mean yield or yield stability, but a superiority of GS over PS emerged for Algeria and tended to emerge for Morocco when comparing the top-yielding lines; (d) GS-derived lines for Stressful Italy displayed comparable mean yield and higher yield stability than other region-specific GS-derived lines. Our results suggested different opportunities for adopting and integrating biotechnology- and agroecology-based approaches depending on the characteristics and objectives of the breeding program.

Indexed as

bulk breedingdrought toleranceevolutionary breedingheterogeneous materialintercroppingintra-species diversityPisum sativumyield stability

Identifiers

PMID40599750
PMCPMC12209206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.