Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599739›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T engineering2025

How Do Novel PFAS Sorbents Fit into Current Engineering Paradigm?

Jonathan Burkhardt, Thomas F Speth, Stanley Gorzelnik, Alexander S Gorzalski, Orlando Coronell, Ahmed Rachid El-Khattabi, Mohamed Ateia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan BurkhardtOffice of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220, United States.
Thomas F SpethOffice of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220, United States.
Stanley GorzelnikOffice of Groundwater and Drinking Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 20004, United States.
Alexander S GorzalskiOne Water Engineering, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605, United States.
Orlando CoronellDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7018-391X
Ahmed Rachid El-KhattabiEnvironmental Finance Center and Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6923-3978
Mohamed AteiaOffice of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-5513

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the emergence of novel sorbents brings new possibilities for treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), drinking water and wastewater utilities face critical decisions in selecting effective, future-ready technologies. With regulatory pressures to address PFAS contamination mounting, however, many utilities may not be in a position to fully evaluate the potential of these novel sorbents and are instead preparing to adopt established technologies that are currently available, such as granular activated carbon (GAC) and ion exchange (IX) resins. Given the expected long life spans of any chosen system, it is important to consider all options, including future treatment innovations. This perspective provides insights into their potential advantages and challenges by exploring the current state of novel sorbents within the broader context of existing technologies. Novel sorbents bring promising benefits, including enhanced selectivity, rapid kinetics, and flexibility for different PFAS chemistries, particularly in challenging matrices such as wastewater. Despite their advantages, significant work remains to refine these materials for large-scale application, including addressing scalability, cost-effectiveness, fouling resistance, and regulatory certification hurdles. By examining key factors for both utilities and novel sorbent developers, this perspective aims to guide informed decisions that balance immediate regulatory compliance with long-term adaptability.

Indexed as

CostEngineering criteriaNovel adsorbentsPFASregulation

Identifiers

PMID40599739
PMCPMC12207388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.