SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid administration for subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tranexamic Acid for Acute Bleeding in Severely Traumatized Patients: Mortality, Neurological Outcomes, and Thromboembolic Risk.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) carries a high risk of early rebleeding and worsens prognosis. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, can prevent rebleeding; however, its effects on mortality and neurological outcomes remain controversial. Methods: This review evaluated the efficacy and safety of TXA with SAH. MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) to assess TXA use in SAH. Studies comparing TXA with controls with SAH were included. The primary outcome was the mortality; secondary outcomes included neurological outcomes, rebleeding, thromboembolism, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), hydrocephalus, and adverse events. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Results: Fifteen RCTs (3,109 patients) and nine NRSIs (1,506 patients) were included. RCTs demonstrated that TXA likely does not reduce mortality (risk ratio [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.22; moderate certainty) and neurological outcome, and may not increase thromboembolism and DCI. However, TXA probably reduces rebleeding but probably increases hydrocephalus. The NRSIs results were similar. Discussion: Although routine use is not supported, TXA may be considered for high-risk patients when early aneurysm treatment is unavailable. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/yp78b/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.