ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Anatomical characteristics of the styloid process in cerebral infarction related to carotid artery dissection: a case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To verify the hypothesis that length and inclination angle of the styloid process may lead to cerebral infarction related to carotid artery dissection through comparison of the length and inclination angle of the styloid process in middle-aged and young stroke patients undergoing carotid artery dissection, vertebral artery dissection, and non-dissection controls. Methods: This was a Retrospective, single-center, case-control study that enrolled patients with cerebral infarction related to internal carotid artery dissection, vertebral artery dissection, and non-dissection controls. Eighteen patients with carotid artery dissection patients (cases) were compared with 34 sex-matched patients with vertebral artery dissection (G1) and 55 sex-matched patients without dissection (G2). The length and inclination angle of the styloid process were measured using Computed tomography angiography images. Differences between groups were estimated using the Student's Results: Styloid process length ipsilateral to the carotid artery dissection was not significantly longer than that of the contralateral side of the cases ( Conclusion: Long styloid process length and a large inclination angle appear to be risk factors for carotid artery dissection (CAD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.