Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599733›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Effect of early neuroendovascular team involvement in acute stroke protocol: a retrospective study.

Hitoshi Mori, Masahiro Kashiura, Ichiro Suzuki, Fumiko Ono, Yuya Yoshimura, Takashi Moriya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hitoshi MoriDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hachinohe City Hospital, Hachinohe, Japan.
Masahiro KashiuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Ichiro SuzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hachinohe City Hospital, Hachinohe, Japan.
Fumiko OnoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hachinohe City Hospital, Hachinohe, Japan.
Yuya YoshimuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hachinohe City Hospital, Hachinohe, Japan.
Takashi MoriyaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with outcomes dependent on timely treatment. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and endovascular therapy (EVT) improve outcomes, but delays reduce their efficacy. This study introduced a protocol featuring early participation of neuroendovascular interventionists and evaluated its association with treatment times and outcomes compared with conventional management. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients with AIS transported to emergency room (ER) who received tPA or EVT between January 2010 and December 2022. Under the protocol, the stroke team-including neuroendovascular interventionists, who made the final decision on tPA and EVT-was activated by the emergency physician when stroke was suspected based on pre-hospital information. The stroke team was not activated if neuroendovascular interventionists were engaged in other procedures or if the ER physician suspected a non-stroke diagnosis. Upon arrival, the team commenced care, with neuroendovascular interventionists reviewing imaging and determining treatment strategies. Patients were categorized into protocol and conventional groups based on management under the new protocol or standard care. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at discharge. Secondary outcomes included time metrics for initiation of tPA and/or EVT. Logistic regression analysis estimated the effects of the protocol, adjusting for confounders, including age, sex, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and pre-hospital factors. Secondary outcomes were assessed using multiple linear regression. Results: This study analyzed 501 patients, with 313 in the protocol group and 188 in the conventional group. Favorable neurological outcomes at discharge (mRS 0-2) were more frequent in the protocol group (44.4% vs. 31.9%; adjusted odds ratio: 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-4.66). The protocol group also showed shorter door-to-imaging time (-8.3 min), door-to-needle time (-55.9 min), door-to-puncture time (-59.8 min), and door-to-recanalization time (-73.7 min). Conclusion: Early engagement of neuroendovascular specialists in the emergency pathway was associated with faster treatment initiation and a higher likelihood of favorable functional status at discharge in this retrospective cohort. Because residual confounding and temporal changes in stroke care cannot be excluded, prospective validation in other settings is warranted.

Indexed as

door-to-treatment timeendovascular therapyneurological outcomesstroke team protocoltissue plasminogen activatorworkflow optimization

Identifiers

PMID40599733
PMCPMC12209294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.