ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2025
Advancing open-source visual analytics in digital pathology: A systematic review of tools, trends, and clinical applications.
Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Advances in Breast Cancer Research: Immunological, Pathological, and Pharmacological Perspectives for Improving Patient Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a pathomics model to predict SOX11 expression and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Detection ofJournal of imaging · 2025Article
- Methylation profiling in neuropathological tumors diagnosis: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histopathology is critical for disease diagnosis, and digital pathology has transformed traditional workflows by digitizing slides, enabling remote consultations, and enhancing analysis through computational methods. In this systematic review, we evaluated open-source visual analytics abilities in digital pathology by screening 254 studies and including 52 that met predefined criteria. Our analysis reveals that these solutions-comprising abilities (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.