ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025
Clinical characteristics influencing timing of cerebral palsy diagnosis in neonatal follow-up.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epilepsy in children with cerebral palsy: perinatal, clinical and neuroimaging correlates - a cross-sectional study from a tertiary care centre in North India.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Neurologic Evaluation of Premature Infants at Term Equivalent Age: Too Early or Too Late? A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe clinical characteristics influencing the timing of cerebral palsy (CP) diagnosis in a traditional neonatal follow-up clinic (NFC) setting. Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study involving preterm infants, born <29 weeks gestation and/or birthweight <1000 g between January 2005 and December 2014, with CP and followed in Calgary's NFC. Infant data were collected, including demographics, perinatal and neonatal parameters, cranial ultrasound (cUS) results, co-occurring conditions, and CP characteristics (timing of suspicion and diagnosis, type, topography, distribution, and Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] level). This cohort was divided into two groups, early (diagnosed <19 months corrected age [CA]) and late (diagnosed ≥19 months CA), based on the median age of CP diagnosis, and characteristics were compared. Results: A total of 99 infants met the inclusion criteria. Median age at first CP suspicion was 9 months CA (interquartile range [IQR] 14) and median age at diagnosis was 19 months CA (IQR 17), with median time lag from suspicion to diagnosis of 6 months (IQR 12). CP characteristics associated with diagnosis at an earlier age included higher GMFCS level, mixed type (compared to spastic only), and upper and lower extremities involvement. Infant characteristics, severity of cUS results, and co-occurring conditions were not different between early and late groups. Conclusions: CP diagnosis timing is affected by GMFCS level, motor type, and distribution. Especially in infants with CP involving less motor impairment, there is a prolonged delay between CP suspicion and formal diagnosis. This gap may be amenable to quality improvement initiatives aimed at targeted implementation of early assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.