Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599663›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025

Unintended consequences of a night float system in Paediatric Residency.

Ali Al Maawali, Allan Puran, Susanna Talarico, Zia Bismilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali Al MaawaliRoyal Hospital, Child Health Department, Muscat, Oman.
Allan PuranDivision of Paediatric Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susanna TalaricoDivision of Paediatric Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zia BismillaDivision of Paediatric Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Many residency programs implement 'night float' (NF) systems as alternatives to a traditional 24-h call model in an attempt to comply with duty-hour regulations. Research evaluating NF systems has focused primarily on the perspective of the resident with respect to fatigue and quality of life. Understanding the broader consequences of NF models from both trainee and faculty points of view is essential to creating effective and sustainable systems to comply with duty-hour regulations while maximizing patient care, education, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: This study used qualitative thematic analysis situated in a constructivist paradigm to explore the experience of an NF system by residents and faculty. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 trainees and 3 faculty members at a large academic pediatric hospital to understand their perceptions of an NF call structure compared to the traditional 24-h call schedule. Results: Three themes were identified: (i) Implications for resident; (ii) Implications for patient and family; and (iii) Implications for curriculum. Eight sub-themes were identified, highlighting both intended and unintended consequences of the NF system. Conclusions: The NF system resulted in the intended outcomes of decreased fatigue and improved continuity of patient care. Unintended outcomes also occurred, however, including negative effects on assessment and feedback, lack of integration of competencies, and mixed results on resident quality of life. These areas require special attention when designing and implementing NF systems.

Indexed as

HospitalistNight FloatPediatric HospitalistPediatric Residency

Identifiers

PMID40599663
PMCPMC12208353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.