ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025
Training and usage of language interpretation services among health care providers in a large Canadian pediatric centre.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Canada has a diverse population and one of the highest immigration rates in the world. Non-English or French language preference populations face barriers accessing health care, which leads to increased rates of adverse events. Adequate training of health care providers (HCPs) with language interpretation services (LIS) and having accessible LIS are crucial to improve the quality of patient care. We sought to identify HCPs' prior training, and use of and attitudes toward LIS in a Canadian tertiary pediatric centre. Methods: An electronic survey was developed and distributed to a diverse group of pediatric HCPs at the Stollery Children's Hospital in Edmonton, Alberta between October 2022 and February 2023. Survey completion was anonymous and voluntary. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data and thematic analysis for free text responses. Results: Three hundred forty-five HCPs accessed the survey and 281 (81%) completed it. Fifty-three percent of respondents encountered a pediatric non-English or French language preference patient/family once weekly or more and 51.5% reported no previous training in the use of LIS in patient care. In-person interpreters were perceived as the most effective LIS modality. Barriers to using LIS included: inability to access desired modality and/or language; insufficient time; and lack of comfort in effective usage. Conclusions: HCPs perceive LIS as integral to patient care and convenient to use, yet most report no prior training. This study identifies multiple barriers to using LIS and suggested improvements include enhancing LIS accessibility, reliability, and LIS education. These results will help inform local LIS initiatives and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.