ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2025
Cross-Species Evidence for Psilocin-Induced Visual Distortions: Apparent Motion Is Perceived by Both Humans and Rats.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serotonin biology as a basis for explaining psychedelic drug action.Current biology : CB · 2026Review
- The development of translational tasks for preclinical psychedelic research in psychiatry.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychedelics, particularly psilocin, are increasingly being studied for their mind-altering effects and potential therapeutic applications in psychiatry. Visual hallucinations, especially the illusion of motion in static images, are a hallmark of their action. Despite growing interest, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, as their systematic evaluation in both humans and animals is challenging. Methods: To investigate psilocin-induced visual distortions, we designed a 2-choice visual discrimination task. Human participants and male rats indicated whether an image appeared static or moving while the image either actually moved or did not. In humans, performance was compared with self-reported hallucination intensity, Altered States of Consciousness scale scores, and psilocin plasma levels. Rats were tested in 2 distinct tasks, a luminance-based task and a motion-based task. Their performance was evaluated alongside decision time. Results: Both species exhibited significant impairment in distinguishing static from dynamic visual stimuli while under psilocin's influence. In humans, this impairment followed the time course of psilocin plasma levels and hallucination intensity. In rats, psilocin selectively impaired performance in the motion-based task, while performance in the luminance-based task remained intact, indicating a specific effect on visual perception. Decision time was linked to discrimination impairment. Conclusions: Psilocin impaired static-dynamic discrimination in both species, providing the first evidence that rats experience visual distortions similar to those reported by humans. The correlations between discrimination impairment, psilocin levels, and hallucination intensity in humans reinforce psilocin's effects on visual perception. This approach provides a valuable tool for investigating the neurobiology of altered visual perception in drug-induced states and psychiatric conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.