ReviewBiomedical reports2025
Antibacterial properties of Maillard reaction products: Molecular mechanisms and influencing factors (Review).
Review in Biomedical reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the Cup: Coffee Extracts as Modulators of Periodontal Inflammation and Bone Remodeling.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Maillard reaction, a non-enzymatic process involving the interaction between carbonyl and amino groups, has attracted substantial interest in biomedical research due to the antibacterial properties of its products. Maillard reaction products (MRPs) exhibit broad-spectrum activity against both foodborne bacteria and pathogenic strains, including antibiotic-resistant strains. These compounds inhibit microbial growth, regulate virulence and disrupt biofilm formation through mechanisms such as metal chelation, membrane disruption and interference with bacterial metabolism. As a result, MRPs emerge as promising alternatives to conventional antibiotics. In the biomedical field, MRPs hold potential for applications in medical device coatings and gut microbiota modulation, where they can prevent microbial colonization and influence host-microbe interactions. However, concerns regarding their safety, cytotoxicity and structural complexity pose significant challenges for broader implementation. Future research should focus on elucidating the structure-activity relationships of MRPs, optimizing their production and evaluating their long-term effects in biological systems. The present review provides an in-depth examination of the antibacterial mechanisms of MRPs, with a particular focus on identifying the bioactive molecules responsible for their activity. Additionally, it explores the potential biomedical applications of MRPs as sustainable antimicrobial agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.