ArticleBiomedical reports2025
Efficacy of tacrolimus and other immunosuppressants in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Biomedical reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High incidence of herpes zoster among SLE patients in Indonesia: a retrospective cohort study.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Calcineurin Inhibitors: Current Role, Toxicity Management, and Future Frontiers in Immunosuppression.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) and other immunosuppressants in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for clinical studies comparing TAC with other immunosuppressive drugs. A total of 12 studies, including 10 randomized controlled trials and two cohort studies involving 1,217 patients, were identified. The results indicated that TAC was significantly superior to cyclophosphamide (CYC) in complete remission (CR) rates [odds ratio (OR)=1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-2.51], whereas no significant differences were found when compared with mycophenolate mofetil [(MMF); OR=0.93; 95% CI: 0.58-1.47] or azathioprine [(AZA); OR=0.95; 95% CI: 0.49-1.84]. Thus, significant differences were found in the partial remission rates between TAC and CYC, MMF, or AZA. TAC demonstrated improvements in the short-term SLE disease activity index scores and albumin levels, with long-term efficacy comparable to that of MMF and CYC. Furthermore, the infection rate with TAC was lower than that with MMF (OR=0.48; 95% CI: 0.31-0.75), but similar to those with CYC and AZA. TAC also showed a lower incidence of leukopenia than AZA (OR=0.13; 95% CI: 0.04-0.43). In conclusion, TAC is superior to CYC in achieving CR in patients with SLE, with comparable efficacy to MMF and AZA. TAC improves short-term disease activity and albumin levels, and its long-term efficacy is similar to those of MMF and CYC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.