ArticleRSC advances2025
Exploring the degree of long-range order/disorder in indaceno-based photovoltaic small molecules using data-driven machine learning analysis.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-range order and disorder in small molecules significantly impact their physical and chemical properties, affecting their performance in photovoltaic devices. For the current study, a data-driven machine learning (ML) approach has been applied to explore the relationship between molecular structure and crystallinity in 480 indaceno-based small molecules. Three ML models, including support vector machines and random forest models, were trained to predict crystal propensity. A heatmap analysis revealed that 72.71% of the small molecules exhibit crystalline behavior, while the remaining 27.29% are non-crystalline. ML models achieved near-perfect accuracy (AUC : SVM-RBF = 0.999, RF = 0.998; MSE : RF = 0.00, SVM-RBF = 0.01). The predicted crystal propensity values showed high accuracy, with a mean squared error ranging from 0.0-0.64. Feature importance analysis using SHAP values identified Chi0v, kappa1, Chi1n, and NumRotatableBonds as the most contributing factors to crystal propensity. The synthetic accessibility score of the small molecules ranged from 0.02 to 0.12, providing insights for designing and optimizing indaceno-based small molecules with tailored crystallinity and photovoltaic properties. This study demonstrates the potential of ML approaches in guiding the development of high-performance small molecules for solar energy applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.