ArticleCureus2025
Intravascular Myopericytoma of the Foot: A Diagnostic Challenge.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Challenge: An Extremely Rare Case of Intra-Articular Myopericytoma of the Knee.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myopericytoma is a rare pericytic tumor, typically occurring in the skin and subcutaneous tissue, though cases in internal organs and bones have been reported. Clinically, it presents as a painless, slow-growing mass, making differential diagnosis challenging. Imaging alone is often insufficient due to overlapping characteristics with angioleiomyoma, glomus tumors, and solitary fibrous tumors (SFT). Histopathological examination is essential for accurate diagnosis. Here, we report a rare case of intravascular myopericytoma of the foot. MRI findings suggested multiple differential diagnoses, but histopathology confirmed the tumor. Immunohistochemistry supported the diagnosis. Marginal excision was performed, and no recurrence was observed after three years. Given the overlapping imaging characteristics of pericytic tumors, histopathological analysis is crucial for distinguishing myopericytoma from similar entities and ensuring proper treatment and management. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive evaluation when diagnosing pericytic tumors in distal extremities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.