ArticleCureus2025
Assessment of Functional Recovery and Complications in Adult Diaphyseal Femur Fractures Treated With Closed Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdults often sustain high-energy injuries called diaphyseal fractures of the femur, which are typically treated surgically for the greatest cure.
objectiveThis study evaluated the functional and radiological outcomes of adult diaphyseal femur fractures treated with closed intramedullary interlocking nailing over a 12-month follow-up using standardized clinical tools. METHODOLOGY: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bacha Khan Medical College, from January 2022 to December 2023. This study included 96 adult patients who had solitary diaphyseal femur fractures treated with closed intramedullary interlocking nailing. We gathered information on recovery parameters, fracture characteristics, and demographics. The Harris hip score and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to measure functional outcomes at six weeks, three months, six months, and one year. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
resultsThe average time to reach radiological union was 14.83 ± 3.12 weeks, and the time to full weight-bearing was 10.42 ± 2.65 weeks. The average range of motion was 122.3° ± 11.8° for the knee and 116.7° ± 10.5° for the hip. At one year, the mean Harris hip score increased from 71.45 ± 13.21 at six weeks to 85.27 ± 8.46, with 39.58% of patients having outstanding scores. The mean pain decreased from 5.27 ± 1.82 to 2.17 ± 1.35, indicating a substantial fall in VAS ratings as well. Sixteen patients (16.67%) had complications, with superficial infections accounting for most cases (n = 6; 6.25%). Transverse fractures (p = 0.035) and early weight-bearing (p = 0.038) were linked to better functional results.
conclusionClosed intramedullary interlocking nailing is an effective treatment for diaphyseal femur fractures, promoting early recovery with favorable functional outcomes and minimal complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.