Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599514›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Impact of Helmet Use on Injury Severity and Clinical Outcomes in E-Bike Riders.

Graysen Pitcher, Monica Mendoza, Andrew McCague, Austin Henken-Siefken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Graysen PitcherMedicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Monica MendozaMedicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Andrew McCagueTrauma and Acute Care Surgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Austin Henken-SiefkenSurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction As electric bicycles (e-bikes) surge in popularity, understanding their impact on rider safety has never been more critical. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of helmet use trends, as well as the efficacy of helmet use in e-bike-related incidents. Key areas of analysis include demographics, injury severity, helmet use, and various clinical outcomes. With the significant rise in e-bike use in recent years, this study aims to evaluate trends in e-bike-related accidents and assess the role of helmet use in reducing injury severity and improving patient outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed using the National Trauma Data Standard (NTDS) from 2018 to 2023 to assess e-bike-related injuries. Patients were identified using 77 specific ICD-10 codes related to e-bike incidents, with 5,474 cases meeting the inclusion criteria. Demographic variables, injury markers, and clinical outcomes - including helmet use, hospital length of stay, ventilator days, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) - were analyzed. Statistical comparisons between helmeted and non-helmeted patients were conducted using Python 3.12.6, employing two-sided Welch's t-tests and Student's t-tests. Results A total of 7,018,732 patients were screened, yielding 5,474 cases of e-bike-related injuries between 2018 and 2023. The mean patient age was 41.1 ± 19.2 years, with 82% (4,493) being male. Demographic data revealed that 1,701 (31.1%) cases involved patients aged 40-60, followed by 1,674 (30.6%) cases aged 20-40, with helmet use rates of 29.5% (501) and 33.4% (559), respectively. Nearly 50% (2,592) of accidents involved traffic-associated collisions, with approximately 25% (1,395) of those incidents involving a car, pick-up truck, or van. Helmet use was associated with fewer ventilator days (0.43 ± 3.16 vs. 0.67 ± 3.93, p = 0.0148) and higher GCS scores (13.98 ± 3.28 vs. 13.75 ± 3.52, p = 0.0141) compared to the non-helmeted group. However, ISS and total hospital days showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion This study demonstrates that helmet use among e-bike riders is associated with improved clinical outcomes, specifically higher GCS scores and fewer ventilator days. These findings reinforce the well-recognized benefits of helmet use across all age groups. Despite this, helmet compliance among e-bike riders remains low nationwide. Future research should examine long-term trends in e-bike incidents, hospital outcomes, and the impact of additional protective measures and regulatory policies. Continued investigation in this field is needed to identify injury patterns and guide public health initiatives aimed at enhancing rider safety.

Indexed as

bikee-bikeelectric bicyclesinjuryprotective benefitstrauma

Identifiers

PMID40599514
PMCPMC12208788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.