Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599513›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A Literature Review on Early Kangaroo Mother Care: Historical Roots, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Integration, and Challenges.

Purnima Sahoo, Santosh K Panda, Niyati Das

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Purnima SahooPediatrics, Kalinga Institute of Nursing Sciences, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed To Be University, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Santosh K PandaNeonatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed To Be University, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Niyati DasPediatrics, Kalinga Institute of Nursing Sciences, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed To Be University, Bhubaneswar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kangaroo mother care (KMC), which includes skin-to-skin contact (SSC) and exclusive breastfeeding, has become a widely recognized and cost-effective method for improving the health and survival of preterm and low-birth-weight (LBW) infants. This review explores the evolution of implementing early KMC, its integration into neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and the barriers hindering its widespread adoption. The benefits of early KMC include better temperature regulation, improved breastfeeding, stronger parent-infant bonding, and reduced mortality. However, many hospitals and communities still face challenges, including a lack of awareness, limited training among healthcare staff, cultural resistance, and inadequate infrastructure. To overcome these obstacles, this review emphasizes the importance of supportive policies, parental education, and ongoing training for healthcare providers. It also discusses the need for practical models and implementation strategies to help expand early KMC programs at both the local and national levels. Drawing on global experiences and new data from countries that have successfully scaled up early KMC, this review presents a vision in which families play a central role in caring for their newborns from birth. Making early KMC available to all who need it, both in hospitals and in the community, is essential for improving newborn survival and achieving global health targets, including the Sustainable Development Goals. This review calls for stronger collaboration among researchers, policymakers, and healthcare workers to establish early KMC as a standard practice in newborn care worldwide.

Indexed as

breastfeedingearly kangaroo mother careinfant mortalitylow-birth-weight babiesneonatal intensive care unitskin-to-skin contact

Identifiers

PMID40599513
PMCPMC12208809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.