ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Patient Perspectives and Concerns Regarding Cataract Surgery and Cataract Surgery Sedation: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Study: Given the low inherent risk posed by modern cataract surgery, there is ongoing debate regarding the need for anesthesia personnel for this procedure. However, few studies report patient perspectives about cataract surgery sedation. We sought to characterize patient perspectives regarding their experiences undergoing cataract surgery with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and their willingness to consider cataract surgery with sedation alternatives to MAC. Methods Used: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 patients (4 women) who recently underwent routine cataract surgery at the University of California, San Francisco. Participants were recruited from the Parnassus Outpatient Surgery Center. Interviews were recorded, de-identified, transcribed, and analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. We ascertained the most relevant themes related to patients' experience with cataract surgery and their perspectives on alternatives to anesthesia-led sedation during routine cataract surgery. Summary of Results: We found that patients are most concerned about achieving the best surgical outcome due to the importance they placed on preserving their vision. They expressed their fear of disrupting surgery intraoperatively and shared that they experienced a relative lack of communication about sedation in advance of surgery. However, while patients expressed a strong preference for anesthesia-led sedation during cataract surgery, they conveyed their openness to considering sedation alternatives in the presence of appropriate perioperative education, the availability of recent evidence supporting the safety of alternative approaches for cataract surgery, and their strong trust in their ophthalmologist's professional recommendations. Conclusion: Patients prefer anesthesia-led sedation for cataract surgery but are willing to consider alternatives to MAC if the published evidence and their ophthalmologist attest that the alternatives are safe and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.