ArticleActa clinica Croatica2024
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION OF THE SMALL DIAGONAL BRANCH IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WITHOUT ST ELEVATION COMPLICATED BY CORONARY ARTERY PERFORATION AND CARDIAC TAMPONADE.
Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Small coronary artery disease is more common in elderly patients, smokers, patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Percutaneous interventions on small coronary arteries are associated with an increased risk of complications (perforation, dissection and restenosis). Coronary artery perforation treatment includes cover stents and coil placement. Case report: A 73-year-old patient, without comorbidities, was hospitalized for acute non ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography showed subocclusion of the first diagonal branch (culprit lesion) while the other epicardial coronary arteries were without stenosis. Multiple predilatations of the target vessel were performed, and as it was a vessel with a diameter of less than 2 mm, no stent was placed. The final angiogram showed normal flow and good morphological result. Half an hour after the procedure, cardiac tamponade and cardiorespiratory arrest developed. Emergency pericardiocentesis was performed and after the return of spontaneous circulation, emergency recoronarography was performed. It showed perforation of the diagonal branch with contrast extravasation. Coronary coil was applied proximal to the perforation site. Perforation repair and hemodynamic stabilization were achieved. Conclusion: Coronary artery perforation is a life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. The risk of perforation is higher in the case of small coronary arteries; it can be presented by delayed cardiac tamponade, which requires increased supervision of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.