ReviewArchives of Razi Institute2024
Probiotics under Selective Pressure: Novel Insights and Biosafety Challenge.
Review in Archives of Razi Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Probiotics and Extracellular Vesicles as Redox Modulators in Wound Healing: From Microbial Therapeutics to Engineered Nanotherapeutic Strategies.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of novel high-resolution physicochemical techniques and the integration of omics technologies into biomedical research have opened avenues for investigating the mechanisms underlying bacterial survival in vitro and in vivo, subjected to the influence of biotic and abiotic stressors. This encompasses axenic cultures, microbial communities, and holobionts. The development of innovative methodological platforms has facilitated the acquisition of unique data relevant to both fundamental and applied scientific fields. The experimental results indicated a remarkably high level of genomic plasticity in microorganisms and the potential for the evolution of bacterial virulence under selective pressure. These findings have significantly impacted our understanding of the arsenal of self-defense tools in bacteria and the prioritization of research in this field. The increasing quantity of factual material now necessitates a shift in focus from pathogens to the broader category of commensal bacteria, which are used as probiotics in various fields, including medicine, agriculture, and the food industry. The possibility of large-scale genomic reorganization and progressive evolution of virulence in these bacteria under stressful conditions, as well as their modulation of host cell signaling systems and suppression of innate immunity, negative regulation of key cell cycle controllers, disruption of the structure of the intestinal microbiota and intestinal homeostasis, highlight the obvious insufficiency of our knowledge about the "logic of life" of symbionts and the mechanisms of their interaction with eukaryotic cells. This may compromise the ideas of several practical applications. This underscores the importance of comprehensive studies of commensals, their potential for plasticity in different environmental conditions, and the ways in which they communicate and interact with regulatory networks of higher organisms. It also highlights the need to develop a standardization for assessing the safety of probiotics. The review addresses these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.