ArticleArchives of Razi Institute2024
Synergistic Influences of Mentha Piperita and Clinoptilolite: A Study on Histologic and Morphometric Outcomes.
Article in Archives of Razi Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Topical Formulations Containing Mentha piperita for Wound Healing: A Scoping Review.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The restoration of healthy human skin function in the early stages is contingent upon the effective healing of wounds. This process requires the highest quality of care. While previous research has examined the individual impacts of Mentha Piperita and clinoptilolite, this experiment demonstrates their synergistic effects, presenting a promising new approach to expedite wound recovery. The study employed a total of 60 male Wistar rats, which were randomly assigned to one of five experimental groups: a negative control group, a positive control group (phenytoin ointment), a clinoptilolite group, an M. Piperita group, and an M. Piperita + clinoptilolite group. All ethical considerations were upheld, and neck wounds were created. Histological examinations were conducted on days 4, 7, and 14. Additionally, collagen deposition, inflammation, and re-epithelialization scores were evaluated on day 14 using the scoring system developed by Abramov. Wound healing assays were conducted on days 4, 7, 10, and 14. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The M. Piperita + clinoptilolite group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the number of fibroblasts and vessels, accompanied by a notable reduction in the inflammatory cell count, when compared to all other experimental groups within the wound site. Furthermore, all groups exhibited significantly elevated collagen deposition and re-epithelialization scores (P-value <0.05) and diminished inflammatory cell infiltration (though not reaching statistical significance) compared to the control group. Furthermore, the M. Piperita + clinoptilolite group exhibited a markedly reduced wound surface area and accelerated healing rate compared to all other groups on all experimental days. On day 14, the recovery percentage reached an impressive 99.75 ± 0.5. The combination of clinoptilolite and M. piperita exerts a significant influence on wound healing, as evidenced by the histopathologic parameters and clinical outcomes. This combination is more effective than the separate usage of either substance or phenytoin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.