Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599424›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Dataset of 111 metagenome-assembled genomes from cattle manure, soil and manured soil samples.

Eduardo Pérez-Valera, Dana Elhottová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eduardo Pérez-ValeraINRAE, University Bourgogne, Institut Agro Dijon, Department of Agroecology, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21000, France.
Dana ElhottováInstitute of Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Sádkách 7, České Budějovice, 370 05, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This data report presents 111 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) reconstructed from manure, soil and manured soil samples from microcosms after enriching for non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB). Two independent microcosm experiments were conducted to investigate the spread of NFGNB from the fresh manure of dairy cows under antibiotic prophylaxis to the pasture soil of two organic farms. After sampling the microcosms on days 2, 14 and 28, the manure and soil samples were plated in duplicate on CHROMagar Acinetobacter medium for NFGNB enrichment and incubated at 28°C for 24 h. DNA was extracted from the cultures and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with 150-bp paired-end reads. Reads were assembled with metaSPAdes both individually and by co-assembly. MAGs were reconstructed using MetaBAT, MaxBin, SemiBin2, COMEbin, and AVAMB, and then de-replicated at >95 % ANI (pairwise comparisons) using dRep. A total of 111 MAGs of at least medium quality (MIMAG standard) were obtained. These included 10 high-quality MAGs (>90 % completeness, <5 % contamination, rRNA genes and tRNA for at least 18 amino acids), 47 putative high-quality MAGs (>90 % completeness, <5 % contamination) and 54 medium-quality MAGs (>50 % completeness, <10 % contamination). The FASTA files of the MAGs as well as their taxonomic identifications, completeness and contamination, origin, genomic statistics and rRNA sequences are publicly available in a Zenodo dataset and the genomes in the NCBI database. The majority of MAGs (99) were assigned to Pseudomonadota, mainly

Indexed as

AcinetobacterCHROMagar acinetobacterNon-fermenting Gram-negative bacteriaOpportunistic pathogensPseudomonas

Identifiers

PMID40599424
PMCPMC12210313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.