ArticleData in brief2025
Dataset of 111 metagenome-assembled genomes from cattle manure, soil and manured soil samples.
Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This data report presents 111 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) reconstructed from manure, soil and manured soil samples from microcosms after enriching for non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB). Two independent microcosm experiments were conducted to investigate the spread of NFGNB from the fresh manure of dairy cows under antibiotic prophylaxis to the pasture soil of two organic farms. After sampling the microcosms on days 2, 14 and 28, the manure and soil samples were plated in duplicate on CHROMagar Acinetobacter medium for NFGNB enrichment and incubated at 28°C for 24 h. DNA was extracted from the cultures and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with 150-bp paired-end reads. Reads were assembled with metaSPAdes both individually and by co-assembly. MAGs were reconstructed using MetaBAT, MaxBin, SemiBin2, COMEbin, and AVAMB, and then de-replicated at >95 % ANI (pairwise comparisons) using dRep. A total of 111 MAGs of at least medium quality (MIMAG standard) were obtained. These included 10 high-quality MAGs (>90 % completeness, <5 % contamination, rRNA genes and tRNA for at least 18 amino acids), 47 putative high-quality MAGs (>90 % completeness, <5 % contamination) and 54 medium-quality MAGs (>50 % completeness, <10 % contamination). The FASTA files of the MAGs as well as their taxonomic identifications, completeness and contamination, origin, genomic statistics and rRNA sequences are publicly available in a Zenodo dataset and the genomes in the NCBI database. The majority of MAGs (99) were assigned to Pseudomonadota, mainly
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.