Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599419›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2025

Abhinav Bhattarai, Sangam Shah, Madhur Bhattarai, Garima Dhakal, Sunraj Tharu, Mandira Khadka, Prakash Sharma, Arun Kharel, Basanta Sharma Paudel, Prativa Subedi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Abhinav BhattaraiInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2232-4124
Sangam ShahInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-3329
Madhur BhattaraiInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6382-1082
Garima DhakalInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.
Sunraj TharuInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.
Mandira KhadkaMaharajgunj Nursing Campus Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.
Prakash SharmaInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.
Arun KharelInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.
Basanta Sharma PaudelInstitute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.
Prativa SubediKist Medical College Lalitpur Nepal.
Shyam Kumar MishraDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is a common hearing disorder prevalent. Methods: A systematic literature search on the databases Medline, Google Scholar, and UpToDate was performed. The study selection process was done in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. In brief, studies were selected first by title and abstract screening followed by a full-text inspection. The study was included if the study reported the incidence of Results: The study search retrieved a total of 8772 studies and 9 of them met out eligibility requirement. There were altogether 964 SNHL patients. In total, 71 (7.3%) were tested positive for Conclusion:

Indexed as

B. burgdorferisensorineural hearing lossSNHL

Identifiers

PMID40599419
PMCPMC12208881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.