ArticleVascular health and risk management2025
Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Predicting the Effect of the Serum γKlotho Level on Susceptibility to Coronary Heart Disease.
Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the relationship between serum γKlotho levels and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk and develops a machine learning model for CHD prediction. Methods: A total of 1435 subjects were enrolled for analysis and randomized as training (n = 969, 70%) or validation (n = 466, 30%) group. The training group was used for univariate regression. Thereafter, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was conducted for selecting independent risk factors for CHD. Using independent risk factors for CHD, nine machine learning models were developed, the best model was selected by evaluating them, and the model was validated by decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The factors independently associated with CHD risk were age, the serum level of γKlotho, LDL-C, sex, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking status. We used these risk factors to construct nine popular machine-learning models. Among all models, the RF model was better appropriate; thus, we visualized and validated this model, which showed promising clinical application. Conclusion: Serum γKlotho levels are novel biomarker which positively related to CHD risk. Additionally, the RF model can better predict the risk of CHD, and RF model is better appropriate to predicting the CHD risk in clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.