ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Risk of major bleeding in recurrent fallers receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- To anticoagulate or not to anticoagulate-that is the question in patients with fall risks.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The risk of fall-related bleeding is a frequent reason for not following recommendations on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Objectives: To assess whether patients on anticoagulation therapy with recurrent falls are at an increased risk of bleeding. Methods: We used data from the Swiss-AF multicenter cohort study, including patients aged ≥65 years with documented AF and oral anticoagulant treatment. Recurrent fallers were defined as those reporting > 1 fall/y. The primary outcome was first major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. To account for death as a competing event, we used the Fine-Gray competing risk regression model to examine the association between a history of recurrent falls and time to a first major bleeding event. The results were expressed as subdistribution hazard ratios with 95% CIs. Results: We included 2154 patients (mean age, 73.4 years; 27.5% female), 180 (8.3%) of whom reported recurrent falls. During a median follow-up of 36 months, 368 (17.1%) patients died, and 218 (10.1%) had a first major bleeding event. Recurrent fallers were more likely to experience trauma-related bleeding episodes than nonfallers (16.7% vs 9.2%). The adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio for major bleeding in recurrent fallers was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.74-1.82). In subgroup analyses of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists, the risk of major bleeding was not increased for recurrent fallers. Conclusion: We found no association between recurrent falls and risk of major bleeding in AF patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.