Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599357›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Enhanced Maize Leaf Disease Detection and Classification Using an Integrated CNN-ViT Model.

Gunjan Shandilya, Sheifali Gupta, Heba G Mohamed, Salil Bharany, Ateeq Ur Rehman, Seada Hussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gunjan ShandilyaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology Chitkara University Punjab India.
Sheifali GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology Chitkara University Punjab India.
Heba G MohamedDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Salil BharanyChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology Chitkara University Punjab India.
Ateeq Ur RehmanSchool of Computing Gachon University Seongnam-Si Republic of Korea.
Seada HussenDepartment of Electrical Power Adama Science and Technology University Adama Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4251-2971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maize crop productivity is significantly impacted by various foliar diseases, emphasizing the need for early, accurate, and automated disease detection methods to enable timely intervention and ensure optimal crop management. Traditional classification techniques often fall short in capturing the complex visual patterns inherent in disease-affected leaf imagery, resulting in limited diagnostic performance. To overcome these limitations, this study introduces a robust hybrid deep learning framework that synergistically combines convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs) for enhanced maize leaf disease classification. In the proposed architecture, the CNN module effectively extracts fine-grained local features, while the ViT module captures long-range contextual dependencies through self-attention mechanisms. The complementary features obtained from both branches are concatenated and passed through fully connected layers for final classification. Data from Mendeley and Kaggle were used to build and check the model, and the model did this by applying image resizing, data normalization, expanding its training data, and shuffling the data to increase generalization. Additional testing is done on the corn disease and severity (CD&S) dataset, which is separate from the main combined dataset. After validation, the accuracy of the proposed model was 99.15%, and each of its precision, recall, and F1-score equaled 99.13%. To confirm it is statistically reliable, 5-fold cross-validation was performed, reporting on the Kaggle + Mendeley set an average accuracy of 99.06% and on the CD&S dataset 95.93%. As both of these scores are high, it shows that the model works well across other datasets as well. Experiments have shown that Hybrid CNN-ViT works better than standalone CNNs. Dropout regularization and using the RAdam optimizer greatly improved both stability and performance. The model stood out as a reliable, high-accuracy method for discovering maize diseases correctly, which may be valuable in real agricultural settings.

Indexed as

CD&S datasetconvolutional neural network (CNN)deep learning (DL)hybrid CNN‐ViTmaize leaf diseaseplant disease classificationplant village datasetvision transformer (ViT)

Identifiers

PMID40599357
PMCPMC12208913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.