ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Development and contextual analysis of a person-centered professional practice model in a home care service in French-speaking Switzerland.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping Person-Centred Care in Wound Management: A Scoping Review of Frameworks, Concepts and Outcome Measures.International wound journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Swiss healthcare system faces increasing challenges with an aging population and rising prevalence of chronic conditions, necessitating better-coordinated care delivery, particularly in home care settings. Objectives: This study aimed to develop (objective 1) and conduct a contextual analysis for implementation (objective 2) of a person-centered professional practice model for home care services in French-speaking Switzerland. Methods: A multi-method approach was used. For objective 1, concept mapping with 157 healthcare professionals (86% response rate) was conducted to develop the model. For objective 2, a contextual analysis was guided by the Intervention Mapping framework, involving focus groups with stakeholders ( Results: The concept mapping process identified 13 core values rated on importance (scale 1-5), with health promotion scoring highest (4.4) and interprofessionalism lowest (3.7). Implementation analysis revealed key facilitators including leadership support (83% agreement) and barriers such as linguistic/cultural differences. Eight implementation strategies were identified and validated through a Delphi process, including continuous training (67% strong agreement) and safety culture promotion (83% strong agreement). Conclusions: The study demonstrates that developing and implementing a person-centered professional practice model is feasible in home care settings when supported by strong leadership commitment and structured implementation strategies. The model's alignment with the Person-centred Practice Framework of McCance and McCormack provides theoretical validation while offering practical guidance for implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.