ArticleNMC case report journal2025
Visual Evoked Potential Monitoring in Long-term Anesthesia Maintenance and Challenging Environments for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation Treatment: A Technical Case Report.
Article in NMC case report journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The monitoring of intraoperative optic nerve protection using visual evoked potential has been increasingly used in neurosurgical procedures. Although visual evoked potential is a valuable tool, its application is often hindered by anesthetic limitations and challenges related to measurement and recording environments. This case study indicates the successful use of visual evoked potential monitoring during long-term anesthesia maintenance and in artifact-prone environments for the treatment of a ruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformation. We report the case of a woman in her 30s who underwent surgical treatment for a ruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformation in the right occipital lobe, adjacent to the optic radiation. Visual evoked potential monitoring was essential during both transarterial embolization and subsequent microsurgical resection. During transarterial embolization, the implementation of improved measurement environments, localized light stimulation, and optimized recording conditions facilitated stable visual evoked potential monitoring despite the high levels of environmental noise in the angiography suite. Post-embolization, deep sedation was required to mitigate the risk of postoperative bleeding, causing an 18-hr duration of anesthesia before microsurgical resection. Despite the prolonged anesthesia, visual evoked potential monitoring was successfully maintained by carefully managing anesthesia depth. This case shows that visual evoked potential monitoring can be reliable and reproducible during extended periods of anesthesia and in challenging, artifact-rich environments. These findings underscore the feasibility of using visual evoked potential in complex neurosurgical cases, even under less-than-ideal conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.