ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2025
[Survey of Compliance With ARRIVE Guidelines in Medical Research Papers in Chinese].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the current status of compliance with animal experiment reporting guidelines in medical research papers published in Chinese and to enhance the transparency of medical research reporting. Methods: Using a predefined literature search strategy, we conducted searches in the Results: A total of 4818 research papers were included in the analysis, and none comprehensively reported all 22 pieces of information investigated in the study. Most of the research papers published in 2019 and 2022 reported information on the control groups, with the reporting rate for the respective years being 99.8% (2461/2467) and 99.7% (2343/2351). Although the sample size reporting rates were 79.2% (1954/2467) for research papers published in 2019 and 77.2% (1815/2351) for those published in 2022, none described the method and rationale of sample size calculation. The reporting rates of randomisation and blinding methods were approximately 20% and 1%, respectively. The reporting of statistical methods increased slightly from 91.8% in 2019 to 96.0% in 2022. The reporting of information on the experimental animals showed mixed trends for 2019 and 2022, including the provenance of animals (93.8% vs. 93.7%, Conclusions: Since ARRIVE Guidelines 2.0 was released, transparency in the reporting of most of the ARRIVE checklist items of interest in this study has improved significantly. However, the reporting of randomization, blinding, ethical statement, and declaration of interests still need further improvement and should be prioritized for future efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.