ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2025
[Exposure to Lead, Arsenic, Mercury, and Cadmium in Populations in Sichuan and Chongqing : A Comparative Study of Reference Intervals Derived From Direct and Indirect Sampling Methods].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Establishment of a Noninvasive Diagnostic Model for Wilson Disease Using Metallomics and Machine Learning].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the exposure levels of heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, mercury, and cadmium, in the local population in Sichuan and Chongqing, China, to compare and analyze the differences in reference intervals (RIs) obtained from direct and indirect sampling methods, and to explore the interchangeability and limitations of these two sampling methods. Methods: RIs were obtained by the direct sampling method and the indirect sampling method. In the direct sample method, the levels of blood arsenic, urinary cadmium, urinary mercury, and blood lead levels of 5562 healthy participants aged 22-50 years in Sichuan and Chongqing, China were measured by atomic absorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Using the human biomonitoring (HBM) data, we established RIs for the population by a nonparametric method. On the other hand, in the indirect sampling method, RIs were established via a nonparametric method based on data from the laboratory information system (LIS) of a local hospital after stratifying healthy individuals using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM). Comparative analysis of the RIs derived from the two sampling methods were then conducted. Results: The RI for blood arsenic was 0.11-1.3 μmol/L. The RI for urinary cadmium was 0.51-2.80 μmol/mol creatine for adults aged 22 to under 43 years and 0.66-2.96 μmol/mol creatine for adults aged 43-50 years. The RI for urinary mercury was 0.12-1.10 μmol/mol creatine. The RI for blood lead was 14.00-47.00 μg/L for adults aged 22 to under 41 year, 16.00-53.38 μg/L for males aged 41-50 year, and 15.00-51.02 μg/L for females aged 41-50 year. Most of the RIs established by the direct sampling method had a narrower range compared to those established by the indirect sampling method, and the RIs established by both sampling methods were partially biased. Conclusions: The RIs for blood arsenic, urine cadmium, urine mercury, and blood lead in healthy individuals aged 22-50 years in Sichuan and Chongqing, China were established using both direct and indirect sampling methods, which contributes to a better understanding of environmental exposure to metals in the general population and provides a reference for metal poisoning. For data from the same lab, the GMM-based indirect sampling method demonstrated relatively consistent performance in establishing RIs compared with the direct sampling method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.