ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
An explainable-by-design end-to-end AI framework based on prototypical part learning for lesion detection and classification in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis images.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep Learning Algorithms Versus Radiologists in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Interpretable deep learning for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy diagnosis: a multi-center study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, making early detection through breast screening crucial for improving patient outcomes. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is an advanced radiographic technique that enhances clarity over traditional mammography by compiling multiple X-ray images into a 3D reconstruction, thereby improving cancer detection rates. However, the large data volume of DBT poses a challenge for timely analysis. This study aims to introduce a transparent AI system that not only provides a prediction but also an explanation of that prediction, expediting the analysis of DBT scans while ensuring interpretability. Methods: The study employs a two-stage deep learning process. The first stage uses state-of-the-art Neural Network (NN) models, specifically YOLOv5 and YOLOv8, to detect lesions within the scans. An ensemble method is also explored to enhance detection capabilities. The second stage involves classifying the identified lesions using ProtoPNet, an inherently transparent NN that leverages prototypical part learning to distinguish between benign and cancerous lesions. The system facilitates clear interpretability in decision-making, which is crucial for medical diagnostics. Results: The performance of the AI system demonstrates competitive metric results for both detection and classification tasks (a recall of 0.76 and an accuracy of 0.70, respectively). The evaluation metrics, together with the validation by expert radiologists through clinical feedback, highlight the potential of the system for future clinical relevance. Despite challenges such as dataset limitations and the need for more accurate ground truth annotations, which limit the final values of the metrics, the approach shows significant advancement in applying AI to DBT scans. Conclusions: This study contributes to the growing field of AI in breast cancer screening by emphasizing the need for systems that are not only accurate but also transparent and interpretable. The proposed AI system marks a significant step forward in the timely and accurate analysis of DBT scans, with potential implications for improving early breast cancer detection and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.