ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Biomechanics associated with bone stress injury in athletes differ by proximal and distal anatomical locations: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone stress injury (BSI) is a common overuse injury in female athletes that can occur in a variety of bones, including both proximal (pelvis, sacrum, femoral neck) or distal (tibia, fibula, metatarsals) locations. Prior work has demonstrated differences in running biomechanics in those with BSI; however, this was not separated by anatomy. We hypothesised that both female athletes with distal BSI and female athletes with proximal BSI would have lower cadence, higher centre of mass (COM) and lower duty factor than those without prior BSI. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 45 female athletes (15 with prior distal BSI, 15 with prior proximal BSI and 15 with no BSI history). Each ran on an instrumented treadmill at self-selected and 5-kilometre race speeds, with data collected in a fresh and exerted state. A series of analysis of variance tests (ANOVAs, group by condition) were used to analyse the results. Results: Participants with previous proximal BSI ran with greater vertical COM excursion compared with those with no previous BSI at race speed (10.2±1.7 cm vs 8.5±0.8 cm (p<0.001)). The proximal BSI population had a lower cadence than the no prior BSI population at race speed (170±13 steps per minute vs 180±10 steps per minute (p=0.012)). Duty factor was lower in the proximal BSI group compared with the distal BSI group at the race speed (32±3% vs 34±3% (p=0.013)). Conclusion: COM and cadence should be further investigated for association with proximal BSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.