ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Dosage Regimen Optimization of Ertapenem Against ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales Infection in Critically Ill Patients Using Monte Carlo Simulation.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dosage Regimen Optimization of Ertapenem Against ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales Infection in Critically Ill Patients Using Monte Carlo Simulation.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales infections are associated with high mortality rates. Ertapenem is recommended as one of the first-line drugs due to its efficacy against these pathogens. However, physiological changes in critically ill patients may influence drug pharmacokinetics. Thus, this study aims to optimize the ertapenem dosage regimen for critically ill patients in both efficacy and neurotoxicity. The previously reported population pharmacokinetic model and drug-albumin binding model were used for Monte Carlo simulation. A total of 10 ertapenem dosage regimens were performed in 10,000 simulated critically ill patients with varying degrees of renal function and serum albumin. A PTA of achieving 100% for time of free drug above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) was assessed for efficacy. A PTA of achieving a total drug ≥ 11.77 mg/L was determined for neurotoxicity. A usual recommended dosing of 1 g every 24 h can ensure a PTA > 80% for efficacy only in patients having a creatinine clearance of 30-59 mL/min with unlikely neurotoxic risk (a PTA < 2%). Moreover, the study highlights the need for an individualized ertapenem dosage regimen based on renal function in critically ill patients, as ertapenem in divided doses might be more optimal for both efficacy and safety compared to once daily dosing in patients with creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these dose recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.