ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Predictive Effect of Prognostic Nutritional Index on Lymph Node Regression Rate in Patients with Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of Prognostic Nutritional Index and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Prognosis of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveDetermining reliable predictive indicators of therapeutic efficacy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) can help select those who will benefit the most from treatment. This research assessed the predictive significance of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 128 patients with LANPC who underwent CCRT. The PNI was calculated using peripheral blood values, the optimal cut-off value of the PNI was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the patients were categorized into low- and high-PNI groups. The Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson's chi-square test were employed to test the differences between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of a good response to CCRT.ResultsThe optimal cut-off value for PNI was 51.95. The regression rates of the cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) and total lymph nodes (TLNs) were higher in the high-PNI group compared to the low-PNI group (CLNs 78.67% and 65.91%; TLNs 78.56% and 67.60% respectively). Multivariate logistic regression showed that the PNI served as an independent predictor of CCRT efficacy in patients with LANPC.ConclusionThe PNI is a non-invasive, low-cost, and easy-to-use indicator in clinical practice for patients with LANPC undergoing CCRT. Patients with LANPC and low PNI require attention to ensure early diagnosis of residual disease and timely rescue treatment. These findings may help develop treatment strategies and clinical risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.