Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599051›Full record

ReviewMass spectrometry reviews

Direct Ambient Mass Spectrometry for Food, Beverage, and Agricultural Sample Analysis and Research.

Leigh M Schmidtke, Liang Jiang, Morphy Dumlao, William A Donald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mass spectrometry reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leigh M SchmidtkeGulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9765-5510
Liang JiangGulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8442-3814
Morphy DumlaoGulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4001-0003
William A DonaldSchool of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of New South Wales (Sydney), Canberra, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6622-8193

Funding

This study was conducted by the Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production (project number IC170100008), funded by the Australian Government, with additional support from the Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University and industry partners. IC170100008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ambient and direct mass spectrometry (MS) methods are becoming increasingly used for the rapid analysis of food, beverage and agricultural samples. Novel ionization approaches combined with targeted, or untargeted workflows provide analytical outcomes within a greatly reduced time period compared to traditional separation science coupled with MS detection. This review will provide an overview of atmospheric pressure ionization MS based techniques for analysis of food, beverage and agricultural samples, with an emphasis on direct and rapid analysis including ambient ionization. The review will be completed through presentation of relevant examples of the use of ambient ionization techniques for food and beverage analysis along with the authors perspectives for future challenges relevant to the field.

Indexed as

BeveragesFood AnalysisMass SpectrometryAgricultureAtmospheric PressureHumansauthentificationcompositionfood safetynatural productsprofilingrapid analysis

Identifiers

PMID40599051
PMCPMC12866390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.