ArticleANZ journal of surgery2025
Re-Exploration Carpal Tunnel Surgery for Iatrogenic Median Nerve Injuries.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re-Exploration Carpal Tunnel Surgery for Iatrogenic Median Nerve Injuries.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent peripheral nerve entrapment disorders of the upper limb worldwide, making carpal tunnel release (CTR) one of the most frequently performed procedures. While CTR is typically successful, a small but important subset of patients may experience failure of the initial surgery, presenting with persistent, recurrent, or new symptoms that may necessitate re-exploration. CASE REPORT: This case series details four patients who were referred to a single Plastic Surgeon in Melbourne Australia, with concerning new or persistent symptoms following initial CTR. For each patient, the primary CTR was indicated due to severe, unrelieved symptoms of CTS that were refractory to conservative treatment. DISCUSSION: CTR is generally a highly effective procedure with positive outcomes for most patients. However, in some cases, symptoms can remain unresolved or may even worsen postoperatively. Prompt identification and referral of these patients are crucial to achieve optimal outcomes. For those whose symptoms persist or worsen, exploratory surgery may be indicated for two primary reasons: (1) an incomplete release is suspected, or (2) injury to the median or palmar cutaneous nerve is likely. When exploratory surgery is considered, it should ideally be performed by a reconstructive microsurgeon. Early referral post-CTR is essential, enabling timely re-exploration and, if necessary, simultaneous definitive reconstruction, thereby improving the likelihood of successful resolution of symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.