Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598988›Full record

ArticleAnnals of coloproctology2025

Endoscopic treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a consecutive analysis of multi-institutional data.

Jae Won Shin, Eun-Jung Lee, Sung Sil Park, Kyung Su Han, Chang Gyun Kim, Hee Chul Chang, Won Youn Kim, Eui Chul Jeong, Dong Hyun Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jae Won ShinColonoscopy Study Group, The Korean Society of Coloproctology, Seoul, Korea.
Eun-Jung LeeColonoscopy Study Group, The Korean Society of Coloproctology, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Sil ParkColonoscopy Study Group, The Korean Society of Coloproctology, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Su HanColonoscopy Study Group, The Korean Society of Coloproctology, Seoul, Korea.
Chang Gyun KimColonoscopy Study Group, The Korean Society of Coloproctology, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Chul ChangColonoscopy Study Group, The Korean Society of Coloproctology, Seoul, Korea.
Won Youn KimColonoscopy Study Group, The Korean Society of Coloproctology, Seoul, Korea.
Eui Chul JeongColonoscopy Study Group, The Korean Society of Coloproctology, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Hyun ChoiColonoscopy Study Group, The Korean Society of Coloproctology, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe incidence of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is increasing owing to a rise in colonoscopy screening. For the endoscopic removal of NETs, complete resection including the submucosal layer is essential. Therefore, appropriate endoscopic resection techniques are of critical importance. This study aimed to analyze data on rectal NETs and help provide guidance for their endoscopic treatment.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients who underwent resection for rectal NETs at 6 institutions between 2010 and 2021.

resultsA total of 1,406 tumors were resected from 1,401 patients. During a mean follow-up period of 55.4 months, there were 8 cases (0.5%) of recurrence. Overall, a complete resection was achieved in 77.6% of the patients, with modified endoscopic mucosal resection (mEMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) showing the highest rate at 86.0% and 84.9%, respectively, followed by conventional EMR (cEMR; 68.7%) and snare polypectomy (59.0%). In the subgroup analysis, statistically significant differences were observed in complete resection rates based on tumor size. ESD and mEMR demonstrated significantly higher complete resection rates compared with cEMR. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that tumor location of the lower rectum and advanced techniques (mEMR and ESD) were significant prognostic factors for complete resection rates.

conclusionWhen encountering rectal subepithelial lesions on endoscopic examination, endoscopists should consider the possibility of NETs and carefully decide on the endoscopic treatment method. Therefore, it is advisable to perform mEMR or ESD to achieve complete resection, especially for rectal NETs measuring ≤10 mm.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyEndoscopic mucosal resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionNeuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID40598988
PMCPMC12215322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.