ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2025
Two-stage subsampling variable selection for sparse high-dimensional generalized linear models.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although high-dimensional data analysis has received a lot of attention after the advent of omics data, model selection in this setting continues to be challenging and there is still substantial room for improvement. Through a novel combination of existing methods, we propose here a two-stage subsampling approach for variable selection in high-dimensional generalized linear regression models. In the first stage, we screen the variables using smoothly clipped absolute deviance penalty regularization followed by partial least squares regression on repeated subsamples of the data; we include in the second stage only those predictors that were most frequently selected over the subsamples either by smoothly clipped absolute deviance or for having the top loadings in either of the first two partial least squares regression components. In the second stage, we again repeatedly subsample the data and, for each subsample, we find the best Akaike information criterion model based on an exhaustive search of all possible models on the reduced set of predictors. We then include in the final model those predictors with high selection probability across the subsamples. We prove that the proposed first-stage estimator is
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.