ArticleCancer research2025
Leveraging Whole-Exome Sequencing and Mutational Signatures to Detect Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Cancer.
Article in Cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the therapeutic scope of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer: current indications and future directions.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer research from 2006 to 2025.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The mitochondrial translocation of phosphorylated EZH2 promotes PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA1-deficient epithelial ovarian cancer.Cell discovery · 2026Article
- Clinical application of PARP inhibitors and emerging strategies to overcome resistance: a pan-cancer perspective.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian and Breast Cancers: Biomarkers, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Homologous recombination is a high-fidelity DNA repair mechanism essential for maintaining genome stability. Impairment of this pathway, often due to BRCA1 or BRCA2 inactivation, leads to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), forcing cells to rely on error-prone mechanisms for repairing DNA double-strand breaks, such as nonhomologous or microhomology-mediated end joining. HRD is a clinically important biomarker, particularly in breast and ovarian cancers, as it predicts responsiveness to platinum-based chemotherapies and PARP inhibitors. However, current tests in the clinical setting, mostly based on targeted panel sequencing, lack specificity and lead to a substantial number of false positives. In contrast, whole-genome sequencing, despite its high accuracy, remains largely confined to research because of high costs and logistical constraints. In this issue of Cancer Research, Abbasi and colleagues present HRProfiler, a machine learning-based tool that accurately detects HRD using whole-exome sequencing (WES) data, which is increasingly accessible in clinical oncology. Notably, it demonstrates improved sensitivity in the WES setting compared with existing tools, such as HRDetect and SigMA. As WES continues to gain traction, HRProfiler offers a promising step toward democratizing HRD detection and enabling more precise, genomics-guided treatment strategies. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI. See related article by Abbasi et al., p. 2504.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40598941What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.