ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025
Examining and comparing the clinical characteristics of adults with persisting post-concussion symptoms presenting for outpatient rehabilitation following a mild traumatic brain injury or a minimal head injury.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outpatient rehabilitation can prevent suicide after acquired brain injury.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing people with persisting post-concussion symptoms from an emergency department-based research sample with patients in a clinical rehabilitation sample: an explorative, retrospective analysis.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Observational
- Commentary on "Examining and Comparing the Clinical Characteristics of Adults with Persisting Post-Concussion Symptoms Presenting for Outpatient Rehabilitation Following a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury or a Minimal Head Injury".Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFirst, to describe a clinical sample with persisting post-concussion symptoms after a mild injury to the head. Second, to explore whether patients who sustained a mild traumatic brain injury differed from those with a minimal head injury (no loss of consciousness, no post-traumatic amnesia, no neuroimaging findings).
designCross-sectional clinic-referred sample. SUBJECTS: 178 adult patients with persisting post-concussion symptoms referred to outpatient rehabilitation.
methodsMain outcome measures were Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, and Return-to-work status.
resultsIn the total sample, previous health problems, daily headaches, fatigue, and depressive symptoms were frequent. Most had functional disability on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended and had not returned to full-time work. The mean Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire total score was 29. Only 5 patients had intracranial traumatic injuries. Some 45% had sustained a minimal head injury. Patients with minimal head injury and mild traumatic brain injury had different causes of injury and acute care but were comparable regarding symptom burden and functional limitations.
conclusionClinicians treating persisting post-concussion symptoms may need to target physiological, psychological, and social factors. Many had an injury too mild to meet criteria for a traumatic brain injury, but the clinical phenotype was similar, supporting further research on the mildest head injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.