ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2025
Exploration of adverse event profiles for cefotaxime: a disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating adverse events of antibacterials in infants: insights from FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) data.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCefotaxime has been widely used in the clinical treatment of infections. However, there is still a lack of systematic researches for the adverse event profiles of cefotaxime through large-scale post-marketing monitoring.
methodsThis study investigated the adverse event profiles for cefotaxime in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database, delving into clinical characteristics, adverse event signals and variations in these signals across subgroups.
resultsCompared with Asia, Europe and America more commonly reported once-daily frequency. New severe hepatobiliary disorders were observed in neonates, children, or underweight elderly patients even when using adjusted doses below 1 g. Significant variations in adverse event signals were identified in relation to continent, dose, onset time, and outcome.
conclusionsThe existence of non-recommended frequency in Europe and America warrants clinical attention when using cefotaxime. The identification of new severe hepatobiliary disorders highlights the critical need for personalized dosing strategies and intensified liver function monitoring for neonates, children, and elderly individuals with lower body weights. Furthermore, the differences in adverse event signals across subgroups underscore the necessity of developing targeted monitoring protocols. Further research is required to validate the association. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.