ArticleBMC psychology2025
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the GHQ-28 suicidal ideation index in Spain and Mexico.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Workplace Mental Health Status Among Academic Staff: Psychological Distress, Burnout, and Organisational Culture at a South African University.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuicide is one of the leading causes of death globally and its early detection is key to prevention. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the Suicidal Ideation Index of the GHQ-28 questionnaire in the general population in Spain and Mexico, evaluating its validity and psychometric reliability, as well as its usefulness for cross-cultural studies.
resultsThe research was developed with a total sample of 6377 people; 5573 in Spain and 804 in Mexico. The statistical analysis was divided into two studies: one to validate the index within each country and the other to assess its factorial invariance across countries. Factor analyses confirmed a unidimensional structure of the index, composed of four items related to suicidal thoughts. High levels of reliability were obtained and the invariance of the instrument by gender, psychotropic drug use and country was demonstrated, allowing its comparative use in cross-cultural research.
conclusionsDespite the frequent use of the GHQ-28 in mental health, there was no formal validation of its specific index for suicidal ideation in Spanish-speaking contexts. This study offers the first formal validation of the Suicidal Ideation Index of the GHQ-28 in Spanish-speaking populations. The index showed a unidimensional structure, high reliability, and measurement invariance across gender, psychotropic drug use, and country. These results support its use as a reliable tool for detecting suicidal ideation and for cross-cultural research in mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.