ReviewStem cell research & therapy2025
Causes and therapeutic limitations of clinical alopecia and the advent of human pluripotent stem cell follicular transplantation.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organoids for disease modeling and treatment: state-of-the-art.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Hair follicle organoids: advances in construction, applications, and translational challenges.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Case Report: Paired vertex-occipital assessment reveals donor-area involvement in diffuse unpatterned alopecia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Stem cell-based approaches for alopecia: A narrative review of current and emerging treatment strategies.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hair loss is a prevalent condition that affects many people worldwide and is often associated with self-neglect and anxiety. Hair transplantation is emerging as a viable therapeutic option for addressing several forms of hair loss that are resistant to pharmacological treatments. The etiology of hair loss is multifactorial and includes genetic predisposition, psychological factors, exposure to toxic agents, nutritional deficiencies, and mechanical stress. However, existing treatments, including topical medications, oral therapies, and phototherapy, often fail to provide comprehensive solutions. As a result, hair transplantation is currently the primary option for patients seeking a permanent solution to their hair loss. In this study, we systematically evaluated different hair follicle transplantation techniques and analyzed their respective advantages and limitations. Our results show that challenges such as limited hair follicle supply, suboptimal follicle survival rates, and recurrent hair loss hinder the effectiveness of transplantation, leaving many patients unsatisfied with the available options. Fortunately, advances in regenerative medicine, particularly the development of single-cell-integrated hair follicles or skin organoids derived from induced pluripotent stem cells, offer promising alternatives. These innovations have the potential to provide a substantial supply of uniform hair follicles tailored to the specific needs of individual patients, thereby expanding treatment options for those inadequately served by conventional methods. In summary, apart from a limited range of topical and systemic treatments, hair transplantation is often a last resort for people with hair loss. The potential to generate new hair follicles or organoids heralds a new era for large-scale clinical applications and the establishment of standardized treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.