ArticleBMC psychology2025
Mindfulness and associated factors in expectant fathers during the initial COVID-19 response: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic introduced unprecedented stressors, significantly affecting mental health worldwide. While research has extensively focused on maternal experiences, less attention has been given to the experiences and coping strategies of expectant fathers during this period. Given the recognized benefits of mindfulness in fostering emotional resilience, it is important to examine whether mindfulness practices supported expectant fathers during these challenging times. Therefore, this study aimed to: (a) Characterize the frequency and degree of applied mindfulness practices among expectant fathers during early pandemic conditions. (b) Identify specific sociodemographic and pandemic-related factors associated with their mindfulness practices. (c) Investigate the inter-couple association between expectant fathers' mindfulness practices and those of their pregnant partners.
methodsA cross-sectional study design was employed. Using convenience sampling, 237 pregnant women and their husbands were recruited in Xi'an, China, in February 2020, during the first-level response to COVID-19, a major public health emergency. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires that included demographic information and the Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS). Statistical analyses included non-parametric tests and representational similarity analysis.
resultsAmong the 237 expectant fathers, the median total AMPS score was 41.00 (33.00, 48.00). Comparing the subscales, median scores were lowest for Decentering at 13.00 (10.00, 15.00) and highest for Positive Emotion Regulation at 15.00 (12.00, 17.00). Non-parametric tests indicated that fathers residing in urban areas exhibited higher total AMPS scores compared to those in rural settings [urban: 42.00 (35.00, 48.50) vs. rural: 35.00 (24.50, 43.50), Z = - 2.875, P = 0.004], and higher education (r = 0.268, P < 0.001) and income levels (r = 0.131, P = 0.043) were linked to elevated AMPS scores. AMPS scores differed significantly based on participants' opinions towards encountering COVID-19 during pregnancy (H = 17.796, P < 0.001). Additionally, expectant fathers' AMPS scores were significantly and positively correlated with those of their pregnant partners (r = 0.291, P < 0.001).
conclusionThe study may contribute to a deeper understanding of psychological coping mechanisms among expectant fathers during periods of heightened external stress, highlighting the importance of considering both individual and dyadic factors in perinatal mental health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.