ArticleBMC nursing2025
Toward optimizing new nurse anaesthetist training: a qualitative study of perceptions, experiences, and systemic challenges.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn China, most new nurse anaesthetists graduate from general nursing programs and initially lack anaesthesia-related knowledge, skills, and abilities. Additionally, the absence of uniform training standards for new nurse anaesthetists in China means that many are unable to provide comprehensive anaesthesia care.
objectivesThis study was conducted to understand the perceptions, experiences and systemic challenges for conducting training for new nurse anaesthetists in anaesthesia from the perspectives of both junior nurse anaesthetists who had received a full induction and the training implementers: (1) understanding the experiences and needs of the training process from the perspective of a junior nurse anaesthetist who has received a full induction programme. (2) understanding the recommendations of training implementers (anaesthesiologists educators, administrators, and anaesthesia nursing educators, administrators) on training implementation.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were performed with a purposive sample of 14 participants, comprising junior nurse anaesthetists, anaesthesiologists educators, administrators, and anaesthesia nursing educators, administrators. The data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step method to distill the participants' real feelings, suggestions, and training needs, which were then grouped into sub-themes and themes to provide a structured understanding of the training dynamics.
resultsFour primary themes and ten sub-themes were identified through the analysis. The themes include: (1) characteristics of new nurse anaesthetists; (2) clarification of the role of new nurse anaesthetists and establishment of training content in accordance with job requirements; (3) formation of a diversified teaching method and design of an evaluation system based on the teaching content; and (4) increased attention to new nurse anaesthetists as individuals and to their future development. These themes and sub-themes provide a detailed and structured overview of participants' perceptions, experiences, and systemic challenges from the training.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the training has positively influenced the new nurses' perception of anaesthesia nursing and their job competence. Despite these improvements, several critical steps are necessary to enhance the training's effectiveness and quality. These include carefully selecting and screening trainers, optimizing the training content, addressing stress during the training period, and integrating future career planning into the training program. These measures will contribute to a more comprehensive and supportive training experiences for new nurse anaesthetists. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: XZHMU-2024Y001(20240103).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.