Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598516›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2025

Review: missed tuberculosis cases in India: a systematic analysis of diagnostic, treatment, and reporting gaps.

Rechel Shrisunder, Manesh Muraleedharan, Sammita Jagdish Jadhav, Dwight Figueiredo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rechel ShrisunderSymbiosis Institute of Health Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune City, Maharashtra, 412115, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6146-2024
Manesh MuraleedharanSymbiosis Institute of Health Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune City, Maharashtra, 412115, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7023-5161
Sammita Jagdish JadhavSymbiosis Institute of Health Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune City, Maharashtra, 412115, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2312-3113
Dwight FigueiredoSymbiosis Institute of Health Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune City, Maharashtra, 412115, India. drdwight@sihs.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4548-1998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndia aims to eliminate tuberculosis (TB) by 2025. Despite ongoing efforts to transform TB care, numerous factors contribute to the persistence of missing cases in India. To gain insight into this issue, we performed a comprehensive review to identify the factors responsible for these missing cases, segregating them into patient- and provider-related factors, with reference to the layers of the onion model.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature review using relevant search strings in the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from 2000 to 2024. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies, a qualitative rather than quantitative data analysis approach was considered. For the quality evaluation of studies, we employed a modified version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist.

resultsOf the 253 articles identified, 25 studies that met the criteria for “missing cases” were selected for analysis. Based on the objectives of this review, we identified patient-related factors contributing to missing cases, including geographical displacement due to migration or occupational reasons, alcoholism, illiteracy, personal commitments, side effects to Anti-Tubercular Treatment (ATT), depressive symptoms, perceived social stigma, reluctance to reveal prior treatment history, and no record keeping. Provider-related factors highlighted were inadequate communication and sputum sample collection, exhaustion of pharmaceutical supplies, patient loss to follow-up, ACF versus PCF, inadequacy of diagnostic tests, lack of history taking, misclassification, and issues related to Ni-KSHAY notification. Based on this layer-wise model of missing factors, we discuss pertinent challenges along with plausible strategies and recommendations to stem the rise in missing cases within the Indian context.

conclusionOur novel findings with reference to the onion model allow for systematic highlighting and addressing of the key patient and provider factors that are fuelling missing cases. The results revealed that provider factors predominantly contributed to the missing case TB scenario. Improved accessibility to services, provider training, and competency building (i.e., handling samples, co-morbid patients, and case notifications), along with improving diagnostic infrastructure, would serve to strengthen the cause of TB elimination.

Indexed as

TuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsHumansIndiaUndertreatmentAntitubercular AgentsCasesIndiaMissingOnion modelPatient relatedSystem relatedTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID40598516
PMCPMC12220073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.